FALLACIES:  DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES


Hasty Generalization:  The argument is based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence.  Unrepresentative means not typical.

Non Sequiter (“it does not follow”):  The conclusion is not necessarily the logical result of the facts. Begging the Question:  Presenting as a truth something that ought to be proved by argument. Red Herring:  Irrelevant points divert the reader’s attention from the main issue. Name Calling - Argument ad hominem (“to the man”):  Attacking the opponent’s character rather than the opponent’s argument. Appeal to Emotion -- Argument ad populum (“to the people”):  Appealing to the readers’ emotional reactions to certain subjects. Either/or:  Stating that there are only two sides to the issue, one right and one wrong. Bandwagon:  Saying that something is true because everybody believes this or does it. Straw Man:  Arguing against the weakest or most insignificant issue in an opponent’s argument. Faulty Analogy:  Using a comparison of two things as a proof when those two things may be actually quite different from each other. Quick Fix:  The argument is based on catchy phrases and slogans. Post hoc fallacy:  This error in logic results from mistaking a time connection between two events for a causal relationship. Oversimplification:  An argument gives one simple cause to explain a result or effect. Composition and Division:  The error is to conclude that a part of something has the same characteristics as the entire group or thing.  (Composition)  Conversely, it is an error to conclude that the whole of something has the same characteristic as a part.  (Division) Two Wrongs Make a Right:  Because someone has committed a wrong action does not make another wrong act acceptable. Contrary to Fact Hypothesis:  Stating with a good degree of certainty the results of events that might have occurred but did not. Past Belief:  The reason a person accepts a statement as true is that the statement has been believed in the past. False Authority:  This fallacy occurs when an argument uses as support someone who has neither the knowledge nor the reliability to give evidence on an issue. Misuse of Humor:  Using humor to confuse an issue or turn attention away from the real issues in order to sway someone’s opinion. Appeal to Pity:  This fallacy appears when the speaker or writer tries to convince the listener/reader out of sympathy for a person.  It is asking us to agree with a position because we feel sorry for someone. Appeal to Ignorance:  Since no one has ever proved a claim, it must therefore be false. Plain Folks:  This fallacy is based on the desire of the speaker/writer to identify with ordinary people who take pride in their ordinariness. Snob Appeal:  The writer/speaker tries to identify with an elite or select group. Exaggeration:  The argument goes too far in its conclusions to include any possible exceptions.  Also, the argument may claim far too many benefits than are justified by the evidence. Incorrect Facts:  Basing an argument on evidence that is simply untrue.